Togal vs Kreo
Compare the published workflow, stated best-for information, pricing, and source references below. Sharing a category does not make tools interchangeable. No overall winner is assigned; confirm current inputs, outputs, integration scope, and human-review requirements with each provider.
Published listing comparison
| Comparison | Togal | Kreo |
|---|---|---|
| Tool | Togal AI-assisted construction takeoffs from drawings. | Kreo AI-assisted takeoffs and measurements from plans. |
| Documented purpose | Togal describes a cloud-based takeoff workspace with AI tools for detecting, measuring, counting, comparing, and labeling spaces and features in project plans. Its feature page also describes image, text, and pattern search across drawings. Review the output against the original plans before using quantities in an estimate. | Kreo describes plan-based takeoffs and measurements. Its product page describes detecting drawing elements, extracting quantities, and supporting prompted measurements; verify measurements against the original plans. |
| Construction workflow | Plan-based quantity takeoffs and drawing search during estimating. | Measuring and quantifying construction scope from plans. |
| Best for | Estimators and trade teams assessing drawing takeoff workflows. | Estimators assessing plan-based takeoff workflows. |
| Pricing | Not verified. Check current terms with the provider. | Not verified. Check current terms with the provider. |
| Personas | Not verified | Not verified |
| BIM compatibility | Not verified | Not verified |
| Recorded integrations | No recorded verified integrations. | No recorded verified integrations. |
| Last verified | Live-status verification not yet recorded. | Live-status verification not yet recorded. |
| Sources last reviewed | 2026-09-25 | 2026-09-26 |
| Provider | No affiliate relationship is currently recorded for this provider visit. This annotation reflects status at page generation; republish after partner-status changes. Visit providerAffiliate disclosure. Outbound visits are counted in aggregate; confirm current terms with the provider. | No affiliate relationship is currently recorded for this provider visit. This annotation reflects status at page generation; republish after partner-status changes. Visit providerAffiliate disclosure. Outbound visits are counted in aggregate; confirm current terms with the provider. |
| Sources |
Illustrative takeoff-time savings
Editorial examples only—not researched industry benchmarks, measured vendor results, or a financial ROI forecast.
Assumptions: 15–30 minutes per drawing; 20–30% net time reduction. The area factor is illustrative and uncalibrated: clamp(sqrt(projectSqFt / 25000), 0.75, 1.5).
Illustrative manual hours = drawings × minutes per drawing ÷ 60 × area factor. Illustrative hours saved = manual hours × reduction percentage.
Example: 25,000 square feet and 20 drawings gives 5–10 manual hours and 1–3 hours saved under these assumptions.
Enable JavaScript to change square footage and drawing count in the browser-only calculator. Inputs are not sent or stored. Actual results depend on trade, sheet density, revisions, project complexity, output quality, and human checking.
More Preconstruction & estimating tools
Browse existing published members of this category.
- Beam AI — Automated takeoffs from construction bid documents.
- Document Crunch — AI-assisted construction document and contract risk review.
- Kreo — AI-assisted takeoffs and measurements from plans.
- TestFit — Iterative site feasibility and concept layouts.
- Togal — AI-assisted construction takeoffs from drawings.