Beam AI vs Kreo
Compare the published workflow, stated best-for information, pricing, and source references below. Sharing a category does not make tools interchangeable. No overall winner is assigned; confirm current inputs, outputs, integration scope, and human-review requirements with each provider.
Published listing comparison
| Comparison | Beam AI | Kreo |
|---|---|---|
| Tool | Beam AI Automated takeoffs from construction bid documents. | Kreo AI-assisted takeoffs and measurements from plans. |
| Documented purpose | Beam describes automated multi-trade takeoffs from bid drawings and specifications. Its product page says it reads uploaded documents, generates quantities, and detects addendum changes; review the resulting quantities against source documents. | Kreo describes plan-based takeoffs and measurements. Its product page describes detecting drawing elements, extracting quantities, and supporting prompted measurements; verify measurements against the original plans. |
| Construction workflow | Preparing drawing- and specification-based takeoffs during bidding. | Measuring and quantifying construction scope from plans. |
| Best for | Estimating teams evaluating automated takeoffs for bid documents. | Estimators assessing plan-based takeoff workflows. |
| Pricing | Not verified. Check current terms with the provider. | Not verified. Check current terms with the provider. |
| Personas | Not verified | Not verified |
| BIM compatibility | Not verified | Not verified |
| Recorded integrations | No recorded verified integrations. | No recorded verified integrations. |
| Last verified | Live-status verification not yet recorded. | Live-status verification not yet recorded. |
| Sources last reviewed | 2026-09-26 | 2026-09-26 |
| Provider | No affiliate relationship is currently recorded for this provider visit. This annotation reflects status at page generation; republish after partner-status changes. Visit providerAffiliate disclosure. Outbound visits are counted in aggregate; confirm current terms with the provider. | No affiliate relationship is currently recorded for this provider visit. This annotation reflects status at page generation; republish after partner-status changes. Visit providerAffiliate disclosure. Outbound visits are counted in aggregate; confirm current terms with the provider. |
| Sources |
Illustrative takeoff-time savings
Editorial examples only—not researched industry benchmarks, measured vendor results, or a financial ROI forecast.
Assumptions: 15–30 minutes per drawing; 20–30% net time reduction. The area factor is illustrative and uncalibrated: clamp(sqrt(projectSqFt / 25000), 0.75, 1.5).
Illustrative manual hours = drawings × minutes per drawing ÷ 60 × area factor. Illustrative hours saved = manual hours × reduction percentage.
Example: 25,000 square feet and 20 drawings gives 5–10 manual hours and 1–3 hours saved under these assumptions.
Enable JavaScript to change square footage and drawing count in the browser-only calculator. Inputs are not sent or stored. Actual results depend on trade, sheet density, revisions, project complexity, output quality, and human checking.
More Preconstruction & estimating tools
Browse existing published members of this category.
- Beam AI — Automated takeoffs from construction bid documents.
- Document Crunch — AI-assisted construction document and contract risk review.
- Kreo — AI-assisted takeoffs and measurements from plans.
- TestFit — Iterative site feasibility and concept layouts.
- Togal — AI-assisted construction takeoffs from drawings.